Long COVID vs ME/CFS: symptoms, biomarkers, trials and research

A data-driven comparison of Long COVID and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) built from the Open Source Medicine Foundation biomarker atlases, PubMed literature feeds, ClinicalTrials.gov registry extract and post-acute infection syndrome (PAIS) cohort database.

Roughly half of people with Long COVID lasting more than six months meet ME/CFS criteria, and the two conditions share post-exertional malaise as a defining feature. Much of the ME/CFS research community has reoriented toward Long COVID cohorts because the trigger and onset date are known, so findings flow in both directions.

What each condition is

Long COVID

Also known as: PASC, Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19, Post-COVID-19 condition

Long COVID describes symptoms that persist or emerge more than three months after SARS-CoV-2 infection and cannot be explained by another diagnosis. The World Health Organization calls it post-COVID-19 condition; the US National Institutes of Health uses the term PASC. Common features include fatigue, post-exertional symptom exacerbation, cognitive difficulties, orthostatic intolerance, breathlessness and chest pain. Because the triggering infection is known and recent, Long COVID has attracted large prospective cohorts (RECOVER, PHOSP-COVID) and the largest clinical-trial pipeline of any post-infectious illness.

Atlas scope: Molecular, metabolic, and immunological alterations reported in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC / long COVID) compared to healthy controls and fully recovered individuals.

OSMF resources: biomarker atlas · literature feed

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Also known as: CFS, ME, Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease

ME/CFS is a chronic, multi-system illness defined clinically by a substantial reduction in activity, post-exertional malaise (PEM), unrefreshing sleep and either cognitive impairment or orthostatic intolerance. It frequently begins after an infection, including mononucleosis (EBV), SARS, Q fever, Ross River virus and now SARS-CoV-2, but many cases have no identified trigger. There is no validated diagnostic test; research biomarkers centre on energy metabolism, immune signalling and autonomic function.

Atlas scope: Molecular, metabolic, immunological, and autonomic alterations in myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) compared to healthy sedentary and active controls — including post-exertional malaise (PEM) phenotypes.

OSMF resources: biomarker atlas · literature feed

Side-by-side summary

MeasureLong COVIDME/CFS
Biomarkers catalogued7746
Biomarker categories coveredmetabolic (23), inflammatory (14), vascular (8), immune (7), coagulation (6), proteomic (5), lipidomic (4), neurological (4), microbiome (4), viral (2)inflammatory (10), metabolic (10), autonomic (6), immune (5), mitochondrial (4), functional (4), autoimmune (3), neurological (2), urinary (2)
Markers with LOINC codes2513
Literature studies tracked7575
Most recent tracked study07 Jul 202606 Jul 2026
Registered trials (all statuses)341146
  Recruiting / not yet recruiting8126
  Active, not recruiting269
  Completed15075
  Terminated / withdrawn / suspended2715
  Unknown status5721
Named cohorts in PAIS database83
Therapeutic agents tracked405179

Trial condition matching: Long COVID uses the registry’s mapped condition label; ME/CFS uses the registry’s mapped condition label. Trials listing both conditions: 13.

Shared biomarkers (18)

Markers catalogued in both atlases, matched by normalised name or LOINC code. Rows marked direction differs are reported to change in opposite or inconsistent directions across the two literatures, which may reflect different comparison groups, assays or disease stages rather than true biology.

BiomarkerCategoryDirection in Long COVIDDirection in ME/CFSMatched bySources
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) direction differsinflammatoryIncreased
vs HC, R
Mixed / conflicting
vs HC
LOINC 26881-5Lai et al. 2023; Corbitt et al. 2019
Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) direction differsinflammatoryIncreased
vs HC, R
Mixed / conflicting
vs HC
LOINC 3074-8Lai et al. 2023; Saito et al. 2024; Corbitt et al. 2019
Interleukin-1α (IL-1α)
Interleukin-1 (IL-1α/β) in ME/CFS
inflammatoryIncreased
vs HC, R
Increased
vs HC
LOINC 26864-3Saito et al. 2024; Corbitt et al. 2019
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) direction differsinflammatoryIncreased
vs HC, R
Mixed / conflicting
vs HC
LOINC 1988-5Lai et al. 2023; Strawbridge et al. 2019
Soluble CD14 (sCD14)
sCD14 in ME/CFS
inflammatoryIncreased
vs HC, R
Increased
vs HC
LOINC 30180-5Saito et al. 2024; Saito et al. 2024
Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β)inflammatoryIncreased
vs HC, R
Increased
vs HC
LOINC 27999-4Lai et al. 2023; Corbitt et al. 2019
Interleukin-8 (IL-8)
Interleukin-8 (IL-8 / CXCL8) in ME/CFS direction differs
inflammatoryIncreased
vs HC
Mixed / conflicting
vs HC
LOINC 26998-9Thomas et al. 2024; Corbitt et al. 2019
Interleukin-10 (IL-10)inflammatoryMixed / conflicting
vs HC, R
Mixed / conflicting
vs HC
LOINC 26862-5Thomas et al. 2024; Corbitt et al. 2019
ATP (plasma)metabolicDecreased
vs HC, R
Decreased
vs HC
nameSaito et al. 2024; Saito et al. 2024
SerinemetabolicDecreased
vs HC, R
Decreased
vs HC — LC overlap
nameSaito et al. 2024; Saito et al. 2024
SarcosinemetabolicDecreased
vs HC, R
Decreased
vs HC — LC overlap
nameSaito et al. 2024; Saito et al. 2024
KynureninemetabolicIncreased
vs HC
Increased
vs HC
nameSaito et al. 2024; Saito et al. 2024
Lactate
Lactate (blood) in ME/CFS
metabolicIncreased
vs HC
Increased
vs HC
LOINC 2524-7Baalbaki et al. 2025; Holden et al. 2020
Ceramides
Ceramides (plasma) in ME/CFS
lipidomic / metabolicDecreased
vs R (fully recovered)
Decreased
vs HC
namePérez-Mazliah et al. 2024; Saito et al. 2024
Resistin direction differsvascular / inflammatoryIncreased
vs HC
Mixed / conflicting
vs HC
LOINC 42702-4Lai et al. 2023; Strawbridge et al. 2019
Neurofilament light chain (NfL) direction differsneurologicalIncreased
vs HC
Mixed / conflicting
vs HC
LOINC 94635-5Lai et al. 2023; Maksoud et al. 2023
Anti-GPCR autoantibodies
Anti-GPCR autoantibodies (panel) in ME/CFS
immune / autoimmuneIncreased
vs HC
Increased
vs HC — LC/PACVS overlap
nameWilhelm et al. 2026; Maksoud et al. 2023
Cortisol
Cortisol (diurnal rhythm) in ME/CFS
proteomic / neurologicalMixed / conflicting
vs HC
Mixed / conflicting
vs HC
LOINC 2143-6Baalbaki et al. 2025; Maksoud et al. 2023

Distinct biomarkers

Top 15 markers catalogued for one condition but not matched in the other. Full lists are on the Long COVID atlas and the ME/CFS atlas.

Only in Long COVID atlas (59)

+44 more in the atlas.

Only in ME/CFS atlas (28)

+13 more in the atlas.

Overlapping therapeutics under investigation (28)

Agents that appear in registered trials or the OSMF therapeutic-agent database for both Long COVID and ME/CFS. Inclusion means an agent is being studied, not that it works.

Trials enrolling both conditions (13)

Showing 10 of 13; see the trials tracker.

Research cohorts

Long COVID cohorts (8)

ME/CFS cohorts (3)

Recent research

Frequently asked questions

Can you have both Long COVID and ME/CFS?

They are not mutually exclusive. Both are diagnosed clinically, and a person can meet criteria for Long COVID and ME/CFS at the same time. In the OSMF data the two conditions share 18 catalogued biomarkers, 13 registered trials list both conditions, and 0 cohorts in the PAIS database are relevant to both. Overlap in a dataset is not evidence that one condition causes the other.

How do the biomarker profiles differ?

Long COVID has 77 catalogued markers, led by metabolic (23), inflammatory (14), vascular (8). ME/CFS has 46, led by inflammatory (10), metabolic (10), autonomic (6). 18 markers appear in both atlases, and 6 of those are reported to move in different directions (Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α), C-Reactive Protein (CRP)...). Categories unique to Long COVID: coagulation, lipidomic, microbiome, proteomic, vascular, viral; unique to ME/CFS: autoimmune, autonomic, functional, mitochondrial, urinary.

Which has more active clinical trials?

Long COVID has more: 107 active or recruiting trials versus 35 for ME/CFS (registry snapshot 07 Oct 2026). Totals including completed, terminated and unknown-status studies are 341 for Long COVID and 146 for ME/CFS. Trial counts measure research attention, not treatment efficacy.

Which condition has more recent research?

OSMF tracks 75 recent PubMed-indexed studies for Long COVID (latest 07 Jul 2026) and 75 for ME/CFS (latest 06 Jul 2026). The feeds hold a rolling window of recent publications, so they indicate current publication pace rather than lifetime output. See the Long COVID feed and the ME/CFS feed for the full lists.

Are the same treatments being studied for both?

28 agents appear in the trial registry or therapeutic-agent database for both conditions, including Acupuncture, Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), Conventional Exercise, Cycling, Exercise. All of these are investigational for these indications; none is an approved treatment for either condition. Overlap usually reflects shared hypotheses (immune modulation, autonomic support, antiviral or anti-inflammatory strategies) rather than demonstrated efficacy.

Which has larger research cohorts?

The PAIS cohort database lists 8 named cohorts for Long COVID and 3 named cohorts for ME/CFS, the largest being NIH RECOVER-Adult Cohort (15,000 enrolled) and DecodeME ME/CFS GWAS (15,579 enrolled). Cohorts with stored biospecimens and open external access are the most useful for cross-condition biomarker validation.

Cite this page

Open Source Medicine Foundation. Long COVID vs ME/CFS: symptoms, biomarkers, trials and research compared. OSMF Research Tracker; data as of 07 Oct 2026, page generated 07 Oct 2026. Available at: https://research.opensourcemed.info/compare/long-covid-vs-me-cfs.html@misc{osmf_longcovid_vs_mecfs, author = {Open Source Medicine Foundation}, title = {Long COVID vs ME/CFS: symptoms, biomarkers, trials and research compared}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://research.opensourcemed.info/compare/long-covid-vs-me-cfs.html}}, note = {Data as of 2026-10-07} }

Get OSMF research updates
New biomarker, trial and cohort data, summarised for patients and researchers.

Subscribe on Substack
Disclaimer. This page is an automated, informational synthesis of public research data maintained by the Open Source Medicine Foundation. It is not medical advice, does not establish a diagnosis, and does not endorse any test or treatment. Biomarker directions summarise individual studies that often disagree; registered trials have not necessarily reported results. Discuss any testing or treatment decision with a qualified clinician.

Last updated 07 Oct 2026 (page build). Underlying data: literature feeds 07 Jul 2026 / 06 Jul 2026; trial registry 07 Oct 2026; atlases 29 Jun 2026 / 29 Jun 2026. Generated by scripts/build_compare_pages.py.