Summary
Brimonidine has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Sepsis would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Sepsis. ClinicalTrials.gov lists 1 registered trial linking Brimonidine to Sepsis: 1 is active or not yet recruiting. The most advanced is Phase 4 (NCT05127109). It plans or enrolled 300 participants. Registered activity dates to 2022. No published literature item is linked to Brimonidine and Sepsis in the OSMF database yet, so the record rests on registry entries alone. Registry entries describe intent to study, not outcomes.
The RepurpOS disease-intelligence file for Sepsis ranks 518 candidate therapeutics from Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and PubMed; only a minority carry direct clinical evidence, and this page covers one of those. Spontaneous remission context recorded for the condition: Not applicable — sepsis is an acute life-threatening syndrome; hospital mortality 15-25% for sepsis, 30-45% for septic shock with standard care; long-term complications (post-sepsis syndrome) in 50-70% of survivors.
Evidence table
| Evidence tier | A · Strong |
|---|---|
| Evidence score | 25.0 (trials 5.0, literature 0.0, tier 15, approved bonus 5.0) |
| Registered trials | 1 total: 0 recruiting, 1 active / not yet recruiting, 0 completed, 0 other |
| Linked publications | 0 |
| Agent type | Drug (Small molecule) |
| Development stage (any indication) | Approved |
| Mechanism / class | agonist |
| Data sources | DGIdb |
| Linked via biomarker / target | ADRA2C |
How the evidence score is calculated
- Each registered trial scores by status (recruiting / active / enrolling 3, completed 2.5, not yet recruiting 2, unknown 1, terminated / withdrawn / suspended 0.5) plus a phase bonus (phase 3-4 +2, phase 2 +1, phase 1 +0.5). The trial component is capped at 30.
- Each literature item scores by design (Cochrane review 5, meta-analysis 4, systematic review 3, RCT 3, clinical trial publication 2, curated reference 1.5, other PubMed record 1). The literature component is capped at 30.
- The existing evidence tier adds 15 (A / Strong), 10 (B / Moderate), 5 (C / Preliminary) or 0 (D / Anecdotal).
- Agents approved for any indication (max clinical phase 4) add 5, because an approved agent has an established safety profile that lowers the barrier to repurposing trials.
- The score ranks what has been studied, not what works. It does not read effect sizes or directions of effect.
Registered clinical trials
| NCT ID | Title | Status | Phase | Enrolment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT05127109 | The PASTDUe Nutrition Ecosystem Project (PASTDUe) 2022 | active, not recruiting | Phase 4 | 300 |
Published literature
No publication is linked to this pair yet.
Mechanism and notes
Recorded mechanism or class: agonist.
OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in DGIdb, in this case via the biomarker or target ADRA2C. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.
Frequently asked questions
Is Brimonidine approved for Sepsis?
Brimonidine has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Sepsis would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Sepsis. Approval status for the specific indication should always be confirmed with the relevant regulator and prescribing information.
Is Brimonidine in clinical trials for Sepsis?
ClinicalTrials.gov lists 1 registered trial linking Brimonidine to Sepsis: 1 is active or not yet recruiting. The most advanced is Phase 4 (NCT05127109). It plans or enrolled 300 participants. Registered activity dates to 2022.
What does the evidence show for Brimonidine in Sepsis?
Trials of Brimonidine in Sepsis are registered but none has completed, so there is no outcome evidence from those studies yet; the record is a signal of research interest. OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in DGIdb, in this case via the biomarker or target ADRA2C. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.
Cite this page
Data: ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and the OSMF therapeutic agent database. Last updated 2026-07-05. Page built 2026-10-07.