Disease × agent evidence record

Ciprofloxacin for Sepsis: evidence, trials and status

Ciprofloxacin has both completed registered trials and synthesis-level publications linked to Sepsis. That is the strongest profile in this database, but the summaries here do not extract effect sizes, so read the linked reviews for direction and magnitude of benefit.

8 registered trials 2 recruiting 13 publications Evidence tier A · Strong Score 72.0
Research Tracker › Pairs › Sepsis › Ciprofloxacin
Research map, not treatment advice. This page aggregates registry and literature records. It does not evaluate efficacy, dosing or safety for any individual. Discuss any treatment decision with a qualified clinician.

Summary

Ciprofloxacin has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Sepsis would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Sepsis. ClinicalTrials.gov lists 8 registered trials linking Ciprofloxacin to Sepsis: 2 are currently recruiting; 4 have completed; 2 are terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. The most advanced is Phase 3 (NCT02389036). It plans or enrolled 20010 participants. Registration activity spans 2007 to 2024. The literature layer holds 13 publications for this pair: 3 Cochrane reviews, 3 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews and 5 clinical trial publications. Publication years run from 2011 to 2026. Because at least one synthesis-level source exists (systematic review, meta-analysis or Cochrane review), this pair has been assessed beyond single studies, although the synthesis may concern a different indication.

The RepurpOS disease-intelligence file for Sepsis ranks 518 candidate therapeutics from Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and PubMed; only a minority carry direct clinical evidence, and this page covers one of those. Spontaneous remission context recorded for the condition: Not applicable — sepsis is an acute life-threatening syndrome; hospital mortality 15-25% for sepsis, 30-45% for septic shock with standard care; long-term complications (post-sepsis syndrome) in 50-70% of survivors.

Evidence table

Evidence tierA · Strong
Evidence score72.0 (trials 22.0, literature 30.0, tier 15, approved bonus 5.0)
Registered trials8 total: 2 recruiting, 0 active / not yet recruiting, 4 completed, 2 other
Linked publications13 (5 clinical trial publications, 3 Cochrane reviews, 3 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews)
Agent typeDrug (Small molecule)
Development stage (any indication)Approved
Mechanism / classNot recorded
Data sourcesOpen Targets, ChEMBL
Linked via biomarker / targetADORA2A
How the evidence score is calculated
  • Each registered trial scores by status (recruiting / active / enrolling 3, completed 2.5, not yet recruiting 2, unknown 1, terminated / withdrawn / suspended 0.5) plus a phase bonus (phase 3-4 +2, phase 2 +1, phase 1 +0.5). The trial component is capped at 30.
  • Each literature item scores by design (Cochrane review 5, meta-analysis 4, systematic review 3, RCT 3, clinical trial publication 2, curated reference 1.5, other PubMed record 1). The literature component is capped at 30.
  • The existing evidence tier adds 15 (A / Strong), 10 (B / Moderate), 5 (C / Preliminary) or 0 (D / Anecdotal).
  • Agents approved for any indication (max clinical phase 4) add 5, because an approved agent has an established safety profile that lowers the barrier to repurposing trials.
  • The score ranks what has been studied, not what works. It does not read effect sizes or directions of effect.

Registered clinical trials

NCT IDTitleStatusPhaseEnrolment
NCT02389036Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract in Intensive Care Unit Patients
2017
completedPhase 320,010
NCT05384197Enhanced Versus Extended Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis Regimens for Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in High Infectious Risk Patients
2022
status unknownPhase 3280
NCT01431326Pharmacokinetics of Understudied Drugs Administered to Children Per Standard of Care
2011
completedNot applicable3,520
NCT01793012Drug Monitoring of Antibiotics in Critical Care Patients
2013
completedNot applicable186
NCT01670435Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of Ciproxan-I.V. in Daily Clinical Practice - Analysis Results From a Post-marketing Surveillance
2007
completedNot applicable3,274
NCT06537609A Platform Trial for Gram Negative Bloodstream Infections
2024
recruitingNot applicable2,500
NCT06080698Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infection Oral Antibiotic Therapy Trial
2024
recruitingNot applicable1,030
NCT02240277Meropenem and Ciprofloxacin Dosing in Septic Shock
2014
status unknownNot applicable50

Search ClinicalTrials.gov for newer studies

Published literature

Run the live PubMed search

Mechanism and notes

No mechanism of action is recorded for this pair in the source databases.

OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in Open Targets and ChEMBL, in this case via the biomarker or target ADORA2A. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.

Frequently asked questions

Is Ciprofloxacin approved for Sepsis?

Ciprofloxacin has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Sepsis would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Sepsis. Approval status for the specific indication should always be confirmed with the relevant regulator and prescribing information.

Is Ciprofloxacin in clinical trials for Sepsis?

ClinicalTrials.gov lists 8 registered trials linking Ciprofloxacin to Sepsis: 2 are currently recruiting; 4 have completed; 2 are terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. The most advanced is Phase 3 (NCT02389036). It plans or enrolled 20010 participants. Registration activity spans 2007 to 2024.

What does the evidence show for Ciprofloxacin in Sepsis?

Ciprofloxacin has both completed registered trials and synthesis-level publications linked to Sepsis. That is the strongest profile in this database, but the summaries here do not extract effect sizes, so read the linked reviews for direction and magnitude of benefit. OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in Open Targets and ChEMBL, in this case via the biomarker or target ADORA2A. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.

Cite this page

Open Source Medicine Foundation. Ciprofloxacin for Sepsis: evidence, trials and status. OSMF Research Tracker. Updated 2026-07-05. https://research.opensourcemed.info/pairs/sepsis/ciprofloxacin.html

Data: ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and the OSMF therapeutic agent database. Last updated 2026-07-05. Page built 2026-10-07.

Get OSMF research updates on Substack

This is a research map, not treatment advice. Evidence tiers and scores summarise what has been studied, not whether a treatment works or is safe for you.