Disease × agent evidence record

Atenolol for Obesity: evidence, trials and status

Atenolol has both completed registered trials and synthesis-level publications linked to Obesity. That is the strongest profile in this database, but the summaries here do not extract effect sizes, so read the linked reviews for direction and magnitude of benefit.

2 registered trials 0 recruiting 7 publications Evidence tier A · Strong Score 44.0
Research Tracker › Pairs › Obesity › Atenolol
Research map, not treatment advice. This page aggregates registry and literature records. It does not evaluate efficacy, dosing or safety for any individual. Discuss any treatment decision with a qualified clinician.

Summary

Atenolol has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Obesity would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Obesity. ClinicalTrials.gov lists 2 registered trials linking Atenolol to Obesity: 1 has completed; 1 is terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. The most advanced is Phase 4 (NCT00185094). The largest enrolment is 400 participants (NCT03105661). Registration activity spans 2004 to 2017. The literature layer holds 7 publications for this pair: 2 meta-analyses and 5 clinical trial publications. Publication years run from 2009 to 2026. Because at least one synthesis-level source exists (systematic review, meta-analysis or Cochrane review), this pair has been assessed beyond single studies, although the synthesis may concern a different indication.

The RepurpOS disease-intelligence file for Obesity ranks 368 candidate therapeutics from Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and PubMed; only a minority carry direct clinical evidence, and this page covers one of those. Spontaneous remission context recorded for the condition: Sustained weight loss of >5% without intervention: ~5-10% at 2 years; weight regain almost universal after behavioural intervention alone (95% return to within 5% of starting weight at 5 years on lifestyle alone).

Evidence table

Evidence tierA · Strong
Evidence score44.0 (trials 6.0, literature 18.0, tier 15, approved bonus 5.0)
Registered trials2 total: 0 recruiting, 0 active / not yet recruiting, 1 completed, 1 other
Linked publications7 (5 clinical trial publications, 2 meta-analyses)
Agent typeDrug (Small molecule)
Development stage (any indication)Approved
Mechanism / classNot recorded
Data sourcesDGIdb
Linked via biomarker / targetFTO
How the evidence score is calculated
  • Each registered trial scores by status (recruiting / active / enrolling 3, completed 2.5, not yet recruiting 2, unknown 1, terminated / withdrawn / suspended 0.5) plus a phase bonus (phase 3-4 +2, phase 2 +1, phase 1 +0.5). The trial component is capped at 30.
  • Each literature item scores by design (Cochrane review 5, meta-analysis 4, systematic review 3, RCT 3, clinical trial publication 2, curated reference 1.5, other PubMed record 1). The literature component is capped at 30.
  • The existing evidence tier adds 15 (A / Strong), 10 (B / Moderate), 5 (C / Preliminary) or 0 (D / Anecdotal).
  • Agents approved for any indication (max clinical phase 4) add 5, because an approved agent has an established safety profile that lowers the barrier to repurposing trials.
  • The score ranks what has been studied, not what works. It does not read effect sizes or directions of effect.

Registered clinical trials

NCT IDTitleStatusPhaseEnrolment
NCT00185094A Comparison of the Effect of Olmesartan Medoxomil, Losartan Potassium, and Atenolol on the Ability of Overweight Patients With High Blood Pressure to Respond to Insulin
2004
completedPhase 460
NCT03105661Use of Impedance Cardiography to Decrease the Risk of Pre-eclampsia in Obese Patients
2017
status unknownEarly Phase 1400

Search ClinicalTrials.gov for newer studies

Published literature

Run the live PubMed search

Mechanism and notes

No mechanism of action is recorded for this pair in the source databases.

OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in DGIdb, in this case via the biomarker or target FTO. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.

Frequently asked questions

Is Atenolol approved for Obesity?

Atenolol has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Obesity would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Obesity. Approval status for the specific indication should always be confirmed with the relevant regulator and prescribing information.

Is Atenolol in clinical trials for Obesity?

ClinicalTrials.gov lists 2 registered trials linking Atenolol to Obesity: 1 has completed; 1 is terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. The most advanced is Phase 4 (NCT00185094). The largest enrolment is 400 participants (NCT03105661). Registration activity spans 2004 to 2017.

What does the evidence show for Atenolol in Obesity?

Atenolol has both completed registered trials and synthesis-level publications linked to Obesity. That is the strongest profile in this database, but the summaries here do not extract effect sizes, so read the linked reviews for direction and magnitude of benefit. OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in DGIdb, in this case via the biomarker or target FTO. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.

Cite this page

Open Source Medicine Foundation. Atenolol for Obesity: evidence, trials and status. OSMF Research Tracker. Updated 2026-07-05. https://research.opensourcemed.info/pairs/obesity/atenolol.html

Data: ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and the OSMF therapeutic agent database. Last updated 2026-07-05. Page built 2026-10-07.

Get OSMF research updates on Substack

This is a research map, not treatment advice. Evidence tiers and scores summarise what has been studied, not whether a treatment works or is safe for you.