Disease × agent evidence record

Lopinavir for HIV/AIDS: evidence, trials and status

Lopinavir has both completed registered trials and synthesis-level publications linked to HIV/AIDS. That is the strongest profile in this database, but the summaries here do not extract effect sizes, so read the linked reviews for direction and magnitude of benefit.

8 registered trials 0 recruiting 16 publications Evidence tier A · Strong Score 79.0
Research Tracker › Pairs › HIV/AIDS › Lopinavir
Research map, not treatment advice. This page aggregates registry and literature records. It does not evaluate efficacy, dosing or safety for any individual. Discuss any treatment decision with a qualified clinician.

Summary

Lopinavir has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in HIV/AIDS would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for HIV/AIDS. ClinicalTrials.gov lists 8 registered trials linking Lopinavir to HIV/AIDS: 7 have completed; 1 is terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. The most advanced is Phase 4 (NCT01533272). The largest enrolment is 484 participants (NCT00099632). Registration activity spans 2006 to 2023. The literature layer holds 16 publications for this pair: 5 Cochrane reviews, 4 meta-analyses, 1 systematic review, 1 randomised controlled trial publication and 5 clinical trial publications. Publication years run from 2017 to 2026. Because at least one synthesis-level source exists (systematic review, meta-analysis or Cochrane review), this pair has been assessed beyond single studies, although the synthesis may concern a different indication.

The RepurpOS disease-intelligence file for HIV/AIDS ranks 249 candidate therapeutics from Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and PubMed; only a minority carry direct clinical evidence, and this page covers one of those. Spontaneous remission context recorded for the condition: Spontaneous elite control (natural viremic suppression without ART) in <1% of people living with HIV; untreated, median time to AIDS ~10 years; viral rebound within weeks of ART interruption in 99%+ of patients.

Evidence table

Evidence tierA · Strong
Evidence score79.0 (trials 29.0, literature 30.0, tier 15, approved bonus 5.0)
Registered trials8 total: 0 recruiting, 0 active / not yet recruiting, 7 completed, 1 other
Linked publications16 (5 Cochrane reviews, 5 clinical trial publications, 4 meta-analyses, 1 systematic review, 1 randomised controlled trial publication)
Agent typeDrug (Small molecule)
Development stage (any indication)Approved
Mechanism / classNot recorded
Data sourcesOpen Targets, ChEMBL
How the evidence score is calculated
  • Each registered trial scores by status (recruiting / active / enrolling 3, completed 2.5, not yet recruiting 2, unknown 1, terminated / withdrawn / suspended 0.5) plus a phase bonus (phase 3-4 +2, phase 2 +1, phase 1 +0.5). The trial component is capped at 30.
  • Each literature item scores by design (Cochrane review 5, meta-analysis 4, systematic review 3, RCT 3, clinical trial publication 2, curated reference 1.5, other PubMed record 1). The literature component is capped at 30.
  • The existing evidence tier adds 15 (A / Strong), 10 (B / Moderate), 5 (C / Preliminary) or 0 (D / Anecdotal).
  • Agents approved for any indication (max clinical phase 4) add 5, because an approved agent has an established safety profile that lowers the barrier to repurposing trials.
  • The score ranks what has been studied, not what works. It does not read effect sizes or directions of effect.

Registered clinical trials

NCT IDTitleStatusPhaseEnrolment
NCT00978237Clinical Trial to Assess the Effect of the Change of Efavirenz (EFV) for Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/r) in Lipoatrophy in HIV-infected Patients
2009
completedPhase 420
NCT01533272Study Comparing Two Alternatives of Antiretroviral Therapy as Post-exposure Prophylaxis to HIV-1:FOVIR+EMTRICITABINA + LOPINAVIR/RITONAVIR VS TENOFOVIR+EMTRICITABINA + MARAVIROC (MARAVI-PEP)
2012
completedPhase 4240
NCT02369965Test Albuvirtide in Experienced Patients
2014
completedPhase 3418
NCT00437476Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) in HIV/HCV Coinfected Antiretroviral (ARV) Naive Patients Starting Treatment With Anti-HCV Therapy
2007
status unknownPhase 360
NCT01296152Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between DMPA and LPV/r Among HIV-Infected Women
2011
completedPhase 225
NCT00099632Comparison of Three Anti-HIV Regimens to Prevent Nevirapine Resistance in Women Who Take Nevirapine During Pregnancy
2006
completedPhase 2484
NCT05850728First in Human Study of TLC-ART 101 (ACTU 2001)
2023
completedPhase 112
NCT00585793Relationship Between HIV-1 Subtype and ARV Response
2008
completedNot applicable108

Search ClinicalTrials.gov for newer studies

Published literature

Run the live PubMed search

Mechanism and notes

No mechanism of action is recorded for this pair in the source databases.

OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in Open Targets and ChEMBL. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.

Frequently asked questions

Is Lopinavir approved for HIV/AIDS?

Lopinavir has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in HIV/AIDS would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for HIV/AIDS. Approval status for the specific indication should always be confirmed with the relevant regulator and prescribing information.

Is Lopinavir in clinical trials for HIV/AIDS?

ClinicalTrials.gov lists 8 registered trials linking Lopinavir to HIV/AIDS: 7 have completed; 1 is terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. The most advanced is Phase 4 (NCT01533272). The largest enrolment is 484 participants (NCT00099632). Registration activity spans 2006 to 2023.

What does the evidence show for Lopinavir in HIV/AIDS?

Lopinavir has both completed registered trials and synthesis-level publications linked to HIV/AIDS. That is the strongest profile in this database, but the summaries here do not extract effect sizes, so read the linked reviews for direction and magnitude of benefit. OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in Open Targets and ChEMBL. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.

Cite this page

Open Source Medicine Foundation. Lopinavir for HIV/AIDS: evidence, trials and status. OSMF Research Tracker. Updated 2026-07-05. https://research.opensourcemed.info/pairs/hivaids/lopinavir.html

Data: ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and the OSMF therapeutic agent database. Last updated 2026-07-05. Page built 2026-10-07.

Get OSMF research updates on Substack

This is a research map, not treatment advice. Evidence tiers and scores summarise what has been studied, not whether a treatment works or is safe for you.