Summary
Home-Based Telerehabilitation is tracked by OSMF as an investigational option for Long COVID; no regulator has approved it for this indication, and most post-viral conditions have no approved disease-modifying therapy at all. ClinicalTrials.gov lists 1 registered trial linking Home-Based Telerehabilitation to Long COVID: 1 has completed. None of the registered studies carries a drug-development phase label, which is typical for behavioural, device and supplement protocols. It plans or enrolled 182 participants. Registered activity dates to 2021. The literature layer holds 22 publications for this pair: 6 systematic reviews, 8 clinical trial publications and 8 other publications. Because at least one synthesis-level source exists (systematic review, meta-analysis or Cochrane review), this pair has been assessed beyond single studies, although the synthesis may concern a different indication.
Long COVID / PASC is tracked on the OSMF post-viral programme alongside ME/CFS, Long COVID, POTS and MCAS. Across the programme, 423 candidate agents are logged for Long COVID, most of them preliminary; this page isolates the record for one of them.
Evidence table
| Evidence tier | C · Preliminary |
|---|---|
| Evidence score | 37.5 (trials 2.5, literature 30.0, tier 5, approved bonus 0.0) |
| Registered trials | 1 total: 0 recruiting, 0 active / not yet recruiting, 1 completed, 0 other |
| Linked publications | 22 (8 other publications, 8 clinical trial publications, 6 systematic reviews) |
| Agent type | Behavioural (Behavioral / Protocol / Exercise) |
| Development stage (any indication) | Investigational |
| Mechanism / class | Not recorded |
| Data sources | OSMF therapeutic agent database, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed |
How the evidence score is calculated
- Each registered trial scores by status (recruiting / active / enrolling 3, completed 2.5, not yet recruiting 2, unknown 1, terminated / withdrawn / suspended 0.5) plus a phase bonus (phase 3-4 +2, phase 2 +1, phase 1 +0.5). The trial component is capped at 30.
- Each literature item scores by design (Cochrane review 5, meta-analysis 4, systematic review 3, RCT 3, clinical trial publication 2, curated reference 1.5, other PubMed record 1). The literature component is capped at 30.
- The existing evidence tier adds 15 (A / Strong), 10 (B / Moderate), 5 (C / Preliminary) or 0 (D / Anecdotal).
- Agents approved for any indication (max clinical phase 4) add 5, because an approved agent has an established safety profile that lowers the barrier to repurposing trials.
- The score ranks what has been studied, not what works. It does not read effect sizes or directions of effect.
Registered clinical trials
| NCT ID | Title | Status | Phase | Enrolment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT05205460 | Telerehabilitation in People With Long COVID Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH) · 2021 | completed | Not applicable | 182 |
Published literature
- Clinical trial publication (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 42201014
- Clinical trial publication (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 40325938
- Clinical trial publication (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 40068080
- Clinical trial publication (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 39920519
- Clinical trial publication (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 38937986
- Clinical trial publication (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 38824899
- Clinical trial publication (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 38507659
- Clinical trial publication (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 38500051
- Review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 41768410
- Review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 41003635
- Review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 40995517
- Review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 40769733
- Review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 40435383
- Review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 40422292
- Review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 39859984
- Review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 39485894
- Systematic review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 42271357
- Systematic review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 41244103
- Systematic review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 38841775
- Systematic review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 38389299
- Systematic review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 38311096
- Systematic review (PubMed validation search) PubMed record PMID 36834176
Mechanism and notes
This is a behavioural, rehabilitation or protocol-based intervention rather than a molecule, so no pharmacological mechanism is recorded.
Clinical notes: Investigational for listed conditions. 1 associated trial(s) and 0 study reference(s) in current data. Review primary sources and consult specialists before use.
Safety: Limited specific safety data in these populations. Review full prescribing information and consult specialist. Many agents used off-label or investigational.
Dosing in studies: See linked studies/trials for reported doses and durations; typical protocols vary widely.
Frequently asked questions
Is Home-Based Telerehabilitation approved for Long COVID?
Home-Based Telerehabilitation is tracked by OSMF as an investigational option for Long COVID; no regulator has approved it for this indication, and most post-viral conditions have no approved disease-modifying therapy at all. Approval status for the specific indication should always be confirmed with the relevant regulator and prescribing information.
Is Home-Based Telerehabilitation in clinical trials for Long COVID?
ClinicalTrials.gov lists 1 registered trial linking Home-Based Telerehabilitation to Long COVID: 1 has completed. None of the registered studies carries a drug-development phase label, which is typical for behavioural, device and supplement protocols. It plans or enrolled 182 participants. Registered activity dates to 2021.
What does the evidence show for Home-Based Telerehabilitation in Long COVID?
Home-Based Telerehabilitation has both completed registered trials and synthesis-level publications linked to Long COVID. That is the strongest profile in this database, but the summaries here do not extract effect sizes, so read the linked reviews for direction and magnitude of benefit. OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is C (Preliminary), taken from the OSMF therapeutic agent database, which grades agents by the volume and design of condition-specific evidence rather than by effect size.
Cite this page
Data: ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and the OSMF therapeutic agent database. Last updated 2026-10-07. Page built 2026-10-07.