Summary
| Direction in NAFLD / MASH (Metabolic-Associated Steatohepatitis) | ↑ Elevated — higher than in the comparison group |
|---|---|
| Category | Hepatic |
| Compared against | NAFLD with elevated inflammatory activity vs lower GGT levels |
| Source | Liang et al. 2023 — doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2023.04.025 |
| Condition atlas | NAFLD / MASH (Metabolic-Associated Steatohepatitis) Biomarker Atlas |
Related Hepatic markers in NAFLD / MASH (Metabolic-Associated Steatohepatitis)
Full list: NAFLD / MASH (Metabolic-Associated Steatohepatitis) Biomarker Atlas.
Frequently asked questions
Is GGT high or low in NAFLD / MASH (Metabolic-Associated Steatohepatitis)?
Elevated. Studies summarised in the OSMF atlas report higher GGT in NAFLD / MASH (Metabolic-Associated Steatohepatitis) than in the reference group of the cited comparison (NAFLD with elevated inflammatory activity vs lower GGT levels). Source: Liang et al. 2023.
Which test measures GGT?
The atlas record does not list a standardised clinical test code (LOINC) for GGT, which usually means it was measured with research assays or study-specific protocols rather than a routine clinical panel. Check the cited source for the exact method.
Is one abnormal GGT result diagnostic of NAFLD / MASH (Metabolic-Associated Steatohepatitis)?
No. No single biomarker is diagnostic of NAFLD / MASH (Metabolic-Associated Steatohepatitis). GGT findings come from group comparisons, overlap considerably between patients and controls, and vary with study design, timing and comparison group. A result should be interpreted by a clinician alongside symptoms, history and other tests.
Cite this page
Subscribe on Substack
Last reviewed: 2026-07-03 · Page generated from nafld-mash-metabolic-associated-steatohepatitis.json · Browse: NAFLD / MASH (Metabolic-Associated Steatohepatitis) atlas · Biomarker Index · All marker pages
Disclaimer: This page is an educational synthesis of published, peer-reviewed research and is not medical advice. Biomarker findings vary across studies with case definitions, comparison groups, timing and assay methods. Direction of change reflects the predominant finding in the cited source and does not establish a diagnostic threshold. Discuss any test result with a qualified clinician.