Summary
Nicotine has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Long COVID / Post-Acute COVID Sequelae (PACVS) would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Long COVID / Post-Acute COVID Sequelae (PACVS). No registered clinical trial in this database tests Nicotine specifically in Long COVID / Post-Acute COVID Sequelae (PACVS). The evidence below comes from published literature only, so any clinical signal has not yet been tested prospectively against this condition in a registered study. The literature layer holds 14 publications for this pair: 2 Cochrane reviews, 5 meta-analyses, 2 systematic reviews and 5 clinical trial publications. Publication years run from 2020 to 2026. Because at least one synthesis-level source exists (systematic review, meta-analysis or Cochrane review), this pair has been assessed beyond single studies, although the synthesis may concern a different indication.
The RepurpOS disease-intelligence file for Post-Acute COVID/Vaccination Syndrome ranks 675 candidate therapeutics from Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and PubMed; only a minority carry direct clinical evidence, and this page covers one of those. Spontaneous remission context recorded for the condition: Spontaneous resolution at 12 months: ~50-70% of patients; persistent symptoms at 2 years in 30-50%; severely debilitating long COVID in 10-15% at 1 year without intervention.
Evidence table
| Evidence tier | A · Strong |
|---|---|
| Evidence score | 50.0 (trials 0.0, literature 30.0, tier 15, approved bonus 5.0) |
| Registered trials | 0 total: 0 recruiting, 0 active / not yet recruiting, 0 completed, 0 other |
| Linked publications | 14 (5 meta-analyses, 5 clinical trial publications, 2 Cochrane reviews, 2 systematic reviews) |
| Agent type | Drug (Small molecule) |
| Development stage (any indication) | Approved |
| Mechanism / class | Not recorded |
| Data sources | Open Targets, ChEMBL |
| Linked via biomarker / target | ABO |
How the evidence score is calculated
- Each registered trial scores by status (recruiting / active / enrolling 3, completed 2.5, not yet recruiting 2, unknown 1, terminated / withdrawn / suspended 0.5) plus a phase bonus (phase 3-4 +2, phase 2 +1, phase 1 +0.5). The trial component is capped at 30.
- Each literature item scores by design (Cochrane review 5, meta-analysis 4, systematic review 3, RCT 3, clinical trial publication 2, curated reference 1.5, other PubMed record 1). The literature component is capped at 30.
- The existing evidence tier adds 15 (A / Strong), 10 (B / Moderate), 5 (C / Preliminary) or 0 (D / Anecdotal).
- Agents approved for any indication (max clinical phase 4) add 5, because an approved agent has an established safety profile that lowers the barrier to repurposing trials.
- The score ranks what has been studied, not what works. It does not read effect sizes or directions of effect.
Registered clinical trials
No registered trial links Nicotine to Long COVID / Post-Acute COVID Sequelae (PACVS) in the current OSMF trial extract.
Published literature
- Clinical trial publication Comparison of remote to hybrid methods on recruitment and retention rates in a smoking cessation trialHawes ES, Bontemps AP, Wagner WP et al. · Drug and alcohol dependence · 2026 · PMID 41353912
- Meta-analysis Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors according to Life's Essential 8 in children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis including 1 526 173 participants from 42 countriesNúñez-Cortés R, López-Bueno R, Torres-Castro R et al. · Pediatric obesity · 2025 · PMID 39611250
- Meta-analysis Smoking and vaping alter genes related to mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility and severity: a systematic review and meta-analysisBowsher R, Marczylo TH, Gooch K et al. · The European respiratory journal · 2024 · PMID 38991709
- Clinical trial publication Adaptive Smoking Cessation Using Precessation Varenicline or Nicotine Patch: A Randomized Clinical TrialDavis JM, Masclans L, Rose JE · JAMA network open · 2023 · PMID 37682573
- Clinical trial publication E-cigarettes to Augment Stop Smoking In-person Support and Treatment With Varenicline (E-ASSIST): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled TrialTattan-Birch H, Kock L, Brown J et al. · Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023 · PMID 35738868
- Cochrane review Digital interventions for substance use disorders in young people: rapid reviewMonarque M, Sabetti J, Ferrari M · Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2023 · PMID 36805783
- Cochrane review A review of the characteristic properties of selected tobacco chemicals and their associated etiological risksMaiyo AK, Kibet JK, Kengara FO · Reviews on environmental health · 2023 · PMID 35538694
- Clinical trial publication Effect of financial voucher incentives provided with UK stop smoking services on the cessation of smoking in pregnant women (CPIT III): pragmatic, multicentre, single blinded, phase 3, randomised controlled trialTappin D, Sinclair L, Kee F et al. · BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022 · PMID 36261162
- Clinical trial publication Nicotine patches in patients on mechanical ventilation for severe COVID-19: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trialLabro G, Tubach F, Belin L et al. · Intensive care medicine · 2022 · PMID 35676335
- Systematic review The Intertwining of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, Alcohol, Tobacco or Nicotine Use, and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic ReviewMengin AC, Rolling J, Porche C et al. · International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022 · PMID 36361425
- Meta-analysis Smoking prevalence among hospitalized COVID-19 patients and its association with disease severity and mortality: an expanded re-analysis of a recent publicationFarsalinos K, Bagos PG, Giannouchos T et al. · Harm reduction journal · 2021 · PMID 33453726
- Meta-analysis The association of smoking status with SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization and mortality from COVID-19: a living rapid evidence review with Bayesian meta-analyses (version 7)Simons D, Shahab L, Brown J et al. · Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2021 · PMID 33007104
- Systematic review Transdermal nicotine in non-smokers: A systematic review to design COVID-19 clinical trialsDautzenberg B, Levi A, Adler M et al. · Respiratory medicine and research · 2021 · PMID 34153704
- Meta-analysis A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hospitalised Current Smokers and COVID-19González-Rubio J, Navarro-López C, López-Nájera E et al. · International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020 · PMID 33050574
Mechanism and notes
No mechanism of action is recorded for this pair in the source databases.
OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in Open Targets and ChEMBL, in this case via the biomarker or target ABO. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.
Frequently asked questions
Is Nicotine approved for Long COVID / Post-Acute COVID Sequelae (PACVS)?
Nicotine has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Long COVID / Post-Acute COVID Sequelae (PACVS) would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Long COVID / Post-Acute COVID Sequelae (PACVS). Approval status for the specific indication should always be confirmed with the relevant regulator and prescribing information.
Is Nicotine in clinical trials for Long COVID / Post-Acute COVID Sequelae (PACVS)?
No registered clinical trial in this database tests Nicotine specifically in Long COVID / Post-Acute COVID Sequelae (PACVS). The evidence below comes from published literature only, so any clinical signal has not yet been tested prospectively against this condition in a registered study.
What does the evidence show for Nicotine in Long COVID / Post-Acute COVID Sequelae (PACVS)?
Synthesis-level literature links Nicotine to Long COVID / Post-Acute COVID Sequelae (PACVS), but no registered trial in this database tests the pair, so the evidence is observational, pooled from other indications, or pre-dates registry practice. OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in Open Targets and ChEMBL, in this case via the biomarker or target ABO. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.
Cite this page
Data: ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and the OSMF therapeutic agent database. Last updated 2026-07-05. Page built 2026-10-07.