Disease × agent evidence record

Cyclosporine for Myasthenia Gravis (MG): evidence, trials and status

Trials of Cyclosporine in Myasthenia Gravis (MG) are registered but none has completed, so there is no outcome evidence from those studies yet; the record is a signal of research interest.

1 registered trials 0 recruiting 10 publications Evidence tier A · Strong Score 49.0
Research Tracker › Pairs › Myasthenia Gravis (MG) › Cyclosporine
Research map, not treatment advice. This page aggregates registry and literature records. It does not evaluate efficacy, dosing or safety for any individual. Discuss any treatment decision with a qualified clinician.

Summary

Cyclosporine has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Myasthenia Gravis (MG) would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Myasthenia Gravis (MG). ClinicalTrials.gov lists 1 registered trial linking Cyclosporine to Myasthenia Gravis (MG): 1 is terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. None of the registered studies carries a drug-development phase label, which is typical for behavioural, device and supplement protocols. It plans or enrolled 2000 participants. Registered activity dates to 2017. The literature layer holds 10 publications for this pair: 1 Cochrane review, 1 meta-analysis, 1 systematic review, 2 randomised controlled trial publications and 5 clinical trial publications. Publication years run from 1987 to 2026. Because at least one synthesis-level source exists (systematic review, meta-analysis or Cochrane review), this pair has been assessed beyond single studies, although the synthesis may concern a different indication.

The RepurpOS disease-intelligence file for Myasthenia Gravis ranks 50 candidate therapeutics from Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and PubMed; only a minority carry direct clinical evidence, and this page covers one of those. Spontaneous remission context recorded for the condition: Spontaneous complete stable remission (CSR) in 10-20% of patients over 10 years; generalised MG rarely resolves without treatment; ocular MG may remain limited in 50-60%.

Evidence table

Evidence tierA · Strong
Evidence score49.0 (trials 1.0, literature 28.0, tier 15, approved bonus 5.0)
Registered trials1 total: 0 recruiting, 0 active / not yet recruiting, 0 completed, 1 other
Linked publications10 (5 clinical trial publications, 2 randomised controlled trial publications, 1 Cochrane review, 1 meta-analysis, 1 systematic review)
Agent typeDrug (Small molecule)
Development stage (any indication)Approved
Mechanism / classNot recorded
Data sourcesDGIdb
Linked via biomarker / targetCTLA4
How the evidence score is calculated
  • Each registered trial scores by status (recruiting / active / enrolling 3, completed 2.5, not yet recruiting 2, unknown 1, terminated / withdrawn / suspended 0.5) plus a phase bonus (phase 3-4 +2, phase 2 +1, phase 1 +0.5). The trial component is capped at 30.
  • Each literature item scores by design (Cochrane review 5, meta-analysis 4, systematic review 3, RCT 3, clinical trial publication 2, curated reference 1.5, other PubMed record 1). The literature component is capped at 30.
  • The existing evidence tier adds 15 (A / Strong), 10 (B / Moderate), 5 (C / Preliminary) or 0 (D / Anecdotal).
  • Agents approved for any indication (max clinical phase 4) add 5, because an approved agent has an established safety profile that lowers the barrier to repurposing trials.
  • The score ranks what has been studied, not what works. It does not read effect sizes or directions of effect.

Registered clinical trials

NCT IDTitleStatusPhaseEnrolment
NCT04101578Clinical Prognosis and Progression of Myasthenia Gravis Patients
2017
status unknownNot applicable2,000

Search ClinicalTrials.gov for newer studies

Published literature

Run the live PubMed search

Mechanism and notes

No mechanism of action is recorded for this pair in the source databases.

OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in DGIdb, in this case via the biomarker or target CTLA4. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.

Frequently asked questions

Is Cyclosporine approved for Myasthenia Gravis (MG)?

Cyclosporine has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Myasthenia Gravis (MG) would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Myasthenia Gravis (MG). Approval status for the specific indication should always be confirmed with the relevant regulator and prescribing information.

Is Cyclosporine in clinical trials for Myasthenia Gravis (MG)?

ClinicalTrials.gov lists 1 registered trial linking Cyclosporine to Myasthenia Gravis (MG): 1 is terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. None of the registered studies carries a drug-development phase label, which is typical for behavioural, device and supplement protocols. It plans or enrolled 2000 participants. Registered activity dates to 2017.

What does the evidence show for Cyclosporine in Myasthenia Gravis (MG)?

Trials of Cyclosporine in Myasthenia Gravis (MG) are registered but none has completed, so there is no outcome evidence from those studies yet; the record is a signal of research interest. OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in DGIdb, in this case via the biomarker or target CTLA4. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.

Cite this page

Open Source Medicine Foundation. Cyclosporine for Myasthenia Gravis (MG): evidence, trials and status. OSMF Research Tracker. Updated 2026-07-06. https://research.opensourcemed.info/pairs/myasthenia-gravis/cyclosporine.html

Data: ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and the OSMF therapeutic agent database. Last updated 2026-07-06. Page built 2026-10-07.

Get OSMF research updates on Substack

This is a research map, not treatment advice. Evidence tiers and scores summarise what has been studied, not whether a treatment works or is safe for you.