Disease × agent evidence record

Vinorelbine for Lung Cancer: evidence, trials and status

Vinorelbine has both completed registered trials and synthesis-level publications linked to Lung Cancer. That is the strongest profile in this database, but the summaries here do not extract effect sizes, so read the linked reviews for direction and magnitude of benefit.

8 registered trials 0 recruiting 16 publications Evidence tier A · Strong Score 74.0
Research Tracker › Pairs › Lung Cancer › Vinorelbine
Research map, not treatment advice. This page aggregates registry and literature records. It does not evaluate efficacy, dosing or safety for any individual. Discuss any treatment decision with a qualified clinician.

Summary

Vinorelbine has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Lung Cancer would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Lung Cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov lists 8 registered trials linking Vinorelbine to Lung Cancer: 1 is active or not yet recruiting; 5 have completed; 2 are terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. The most advanced is Phase 3 (NCT02352948). It plans or enrolled 597 participants. Registration activity spans 1999 to 2019. The literature layer holds 16 publications for this pair: 5 Cochrane reviews, 2 meta-analyses, 4 systematic reviews and 5 clinical trial publications. Publication years run from 2018 to 2026. Because at least one synthesis-level source exists (systematic review, meta-analysis or Cochrane review), this pair has been assessed beyond single studies, although the synthesis may concern a different indication.

The RepurpOS disease-intelligence file for Lung Cancer ranks 465 candidate therapeutics from Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and PubMed; only a minority carry direct clinical evidence, and this page covers one of those. Spontaneous remission context recorded for the condition: Spontaneous regression is rare (<0.5% of cases); 5-year survival without treatment: <5% for advanced NSCLC; ~20% for stage I-II with surgery.

Evidence table

Evidence tierA · Strong
Evidence score74.0 (trials 24.0, literature 30.0, tier 15, approved bonus 5.0)
Registered trials8 total: 0 recruiting, 1 active / not yet recruiting, 5 completed, 2 other
Linked publications16 (5 Cochrane reviews, 5 clinical trial publications, 4 systematic reviews, 2 meta-analyses)
Agent typeDrug (Small molecule)
Development stage (any indication)Approved
Mechanism / classNot recorded
Data sourcesDGIdb
Linked via biomarker / targetBRCA1
How the evidence score is calculated
  • Each registered trial scores by status (recruiting / active / enrolling 3, completed 2.5, not yet recruiting 2, unknown 1, terminated / withdrawn / suspended 0.5) plus a phase bonus (phase 3-4 +2, phase 2 +1, phase 1 +0.5). The trial component is capped at 30.
  • Each literature item scores by design (Cochrane review 5, meta-analysis 4, systematic review 3, RCT 3, clinical trial publication 2, curated reference 1.5, other PubMed record 1). The literature component is capped at 30.
  • The existing evidence tier adds 15 (A / Strong), 10 (B / Moderate), 5 (C / Preliminary) or 0 (D / Anecdotal).
  • Agents approved for any indication (max clinical phase 4) add 5, because an approved agent has an established safety profile that lowers the barrier to repurposing trials.
  • The score ranks what has been studied, not what works. It does not read effect sizes or directions of effect.

Registered clinical trials

NCT IDTitleStatusPhaseEnrolment
NCT03456076A Study Comparing Adjuvant Alectinib Versus Adjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With ALK Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
2018
active, not recruitingPhase 3257
NCT02352948A Global Study to Assess the Effects of MEDI4736 (Durvalumab), Given as Monotherapy or in Combination With Tremelimumab Determined by PD-L1 Expression Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
2015
completedPhase 3597
NCT03891173A Study of L-DOS47 in Combination With Vinorelbine/Cisplatin in Lung Adenocarcinoma
2019
terminatedPhase 29
NCT00705549Individualized Therapy Based of Tumoral mRNA Levels of ERCC1, RRM1 and BRCA1 in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
2008
terminatedPhase 288
NCT00001944Vinorelbine and XR9576 to Treat Cancer
1999
completedPhase 130
NCT02603003the"Fuzheng" Therapy of TCM to Improve the Survival Quality of Early-stage NSCLC by Intervening the CTCs
2015
completedPhase 1218
NCT00522886Phase I Cetuximab and Concurrent Radio-chemotherapy
2007
completedPhase 124
NCT00312819Initial Assessment of the Effect of the Addition of Disulfiram (Antabuse) to Standard Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer
2006
completedPHASE2, PHASE360

Search ClinicalTrials.gov for newer studies

Published literature

Run the live PubMed search

Mechanism and notes

No mechanism of action is recorded for this pair in the source databases.

OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in DGIdb, in this case via the biomarker or target BRCA1. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.

Frequently asked questions

Is Vinorelbine approved for Lung Cancer?

Vinorelbine has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Lung Cancer would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Lung Cancer. Approval status for the specific indication should always be confirmed with the relevant regulator and prescribing information.

Is Vinorelbine in clinical trials for Lung Cancer?

ClinicalTrials.gov lists 8 registered trials linking Vinorelbine to Lung Cancer: 1 is active or not yet recruiting; 5 have completed; 2 are terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. The most advanced is Phase 3 (NCT02352948). It plans or enrolled 597 participants. Registration activity spans 1999 to 2019.

What does the evidence show for Vinorelbine in Lung Cancer?

Vinorelbine has both completed registered trials and synthesis-level publications linked to Lung Cancer. That is the strongest profile in this database, but the summaries here do not extract effect sizes, so read the linked reviews for direction and magnitude of benefit. OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in DGIdb, in this case via the biomarker or target BRCA1. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.

Cite this page

Open Source Medicine Foundation. Vinorelbine for Lung Cancer: evidence, trials and status. OSMF Research Tracker. Updated 2026-07-05. https://research.opensourcemed.info/pairs/lung-cancer/vinorelbine.html

Data: ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and the OSMF therapeutic agent database. Last updated 2026-07-05. Page built 2026-10-07.

Get OSMF research updates on Substack

This is a research map, not treatment advice. Evidence tiers and scores summarise what has been studied, not whether a treatment works or is safe for you.