Summary
Oxaliplatin has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Lung Cancer would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Lung Cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov lists 8 registered trials linking Oxaliplatin to Lung Cancer: 3 are currently recruiting; 1 is active or not yet recruiting; 2 have completed; 2 are terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. The most advanced is Phase 1 (NCT06131840). It plans or enrolled 914 participants. Registration activity spans 2017 to 2025. The literature layer holds 16 publications for this pair: 3 Cochrane reviews, 4 meta-analyses, 1 systematic review, 3 randomised controlled trial publications and 5 clinical trial publications. Publication years run from 1997 to 2025. Because at least one synthesis-level source exists (systematic review, meta-analysis or Cochrane review), this pair has been assessed beyond single studies, although the synthesis may concern a different indication.
The RepurpOS disease-intelligence file for Lung Cancer ranks 465 candidate therapeutics from Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and PubMed; only a minority carry direct clinical evidence, and this page covers one of those. Spontaneous remission context recorded for the condition: Spontaneous regression is rare (<0.5% of cases); 5-year survival without treatment: <5% for advanced NSCLC; ~20% for stage I-II with surgery.
Evidence table
| Evidence tier | A · Strong |
|---|---|
| Evidence score | 70.5 (trials 20.5, literature 30.0, tier 15, approved bonus 5.0) |
| Registered trials | 8 total: 3 recruiting, 1 active / not yet recruiting, 2 completed, 2 other |
| Linked publications | 16 (5 clinical trial publications, 4 meta-analyses, 3 Cochrane reviews, 3 randomised controlled trial publications, 1 systematic review) |
| Agent type | Drug (Small molecule) |
| Development stage (any indication) | Approved |
| Mechanism / class | Not recorded |
| Data sources | DGIdb |
| Linked via biomarker / target | BRCA1 |
How the evidence score is calculated
- Each registered trial scores by status (recruiting / active / enrolling 3, completed 2.5, not yet recruiting 2, unknown 1, terminated / withdrawn / suspended 0.5) plus a phase bonus (phase 3-4 +2, phase 2 +1, phase 1 +0.5). The trial component is capped at 30.
- Each literature item scores by design (Cochrane review 5, meta-analysis 4, systematic review 3, RCT 3, clinical trial publication 2, curated reference 1.5, other PubMed record 1). The literature component is capped at 30.
- The existing evidence tier adds 15 (A / Strong), 10 (B / Moderate), 5 (C / Preliminary) or 0 (D / Anecdotal).
- Agents approved for any indication (max clinical phase 4) add 5, because an approved agent has an established safety profile that lowers the barrier to repurposing trials.
- The score ranks what has been studied, not what works. It does not read effect sizes or directions of effect.
Registered clinical trials
| NCT ID | Title | Status | Phase | Enrolment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT05867121 | A Study to Evaluate Safety, Pharmacokinetics, & Activity of RO7496353 in Combination With a Checkpoint Inhibitor With or Without Standard-of-care Chemotherapy in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors; Urothelial Carcinoma Substudy in Association With RO7496353 Study GO44010 2023 | completed | Phase 1 | 102 |
| NCT03250832 | Study of TSR-033 With an Anti-programmed Cell Death-1 Receptor (PD-1) in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors 2017 | completed | Phase 1 | 111 |
| NCT06131840 | A Study of SGN-CEACAM5C in Adults With Advanced Solid Tumors 2023 | recruiting | Phase 1 | 914 |
| NCT06835569 | A Study to Learn About Study Medicine ALTA3263 in Adults With Advanced Solid Tumors With KRAS Mutations 2025 | recruiting | Phase 1 | 448 |
| NCT05576077 | A Study of TBio-4101 (TIL) and Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors 2023 | terminated | Phase 1 | 31 |
| NCT04043195 | Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Combination With Immunogenic Chemotherapy for Patients With Advanced NSCLC 2019 | active, not recruiting | PHASE1, PHASE2 | 30 |
| NCT06047379 | Safety and Efficacy of NEO212 in Patients With Astrocytoma IDH-mutant, Glioblastoma IDH-wildtype or Brain Metastasis 2023 | recruiting | PHASE1, PHASE2 | 134 |
| NCT03009058 | Study of IMM 101 in Combination With Standard of Care in Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Cancer 2017 | terminated | PHASE1, PHASE2 | 2 |
Published literature
- Clinical trial publication Trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: phase 3 PRESERVE 1 trialLenz HJ, Liu T, Chen EY et al. · JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025 · PMID 39579142
- Clinical trial publication Phase I Study of ROR1-Specific CAR-T Cells in Advanced Hematopoietic and Epithelial MalignanciesJaeger-Ruckstuhl CA, Specht JM, Voutsinas JM et al. · Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025 · PMID 39466024
- Meta-analysis The intrapleural administration with thymic peptides in malignant pleural effusion: A clusteredsystematicreview and meta-analysisWang CQ, Shen YS, Chen XF et al. · International immunopharmacology · 2022 · PMID 35293322
- Clinical trial publication Phase II Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy With S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (PerSeUS-RC01)Matsuhashi N, Takahashi T, Tanaka C et al. · Anticancer research · 2021 · PMID 34848480
- Systematic review Genetic Polymorphisms and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicities in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisLiu W, Wang Y, Luo J et al. · Frontiers in oncology · 2019 · PMID 32257953
- Meta-analysis The association between copper transporters and the prognosis of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a meta-analysis of literatures and datasetsSun S, Cai J, Yang Q et al. · Oncotarget · 2017 · PMID 27980217
- Meta-analysis Oxaliplatin-Based Doublets Versus Cisplatin or Carboplatin-Based Doublets in the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung CancerYu J, Xiao J, Yang Y et al. · Medicine · 2015 · PMID 26166081
- Clinical trial publication A multicenter phase II study of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab in first-line therapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous cell histology non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Raez LE, Santos ES, Webb RT et al. · Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2013 · PMID 24057043
- Clinical trial publication Treatment of stage IIIb/IV non-small cell lung cancer with Pemetrexed plus Oxaliplatin after failure of Erlotinib as second-line treatmentShi SB, Hu RH, Qi JL et al. · Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2013 · PMID 23576138
- Cochrane review The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic modelHoyle M, Crathorne L, Peters J et al. · Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2013 · PMID 23547747
- Randomized controlled trial A randomised multicentre phase II study with cisplatin/docetaxel vs oxaliplatin/docetaxel as first-line therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancerAtmaca A, Al-Batran SE, Werner D et al. · British journal of cancer · 2013 · PMID 23329236
- Randomized controlled trial [A randomized controlled study of chemotherapy: etoposide combined with oxaliplatin or cisplatin regimens in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in elderly patients]Pu D, Hou M, Li Z et al. · Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2013 · PMID 23327869
- Randomized controlled trial [A randomized clinical trial on the clinical efficacy and toxicities of single-agent paclitaxel liposome versus paclitaxel liposome plus oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients]Zeng X, Li Z, Hou M · Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2012 · PMID 22336235
- Cochrane review [Vinorelbine plus oxaliplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review]Liu X, Ma L, Yang K et al. · Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2010 · PMID 20673502
- Cochrane review KRAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based and Economic AnalysisMedical Advisory Secretariat · Ontario health technology assessment series · 2010 · PMID 23074403
- Meta-analysis [Oxaliplatin: the first DACH platinum in clinical practice]Soulié P, Raymond E, Brienza S et al. · Bulletin du cancer · 1997 · PMID 9295871
Mechanism and notes
No mechanism of action is recorded for this pair in the source databases.
OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in DGIdb, in this case via the biomarker or target BRCA1. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.
Frequently asked questions
Is Oxaliplatin approved for Lung Cancer?
Oxaliplatin has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Lung Cancer would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Lung Cancer. Approval status for the specific indication should always be confirmed with the relevant regulator and prescribing information.
Is Oxaliplatin in clinical trials for Lung Cancer?
ClinicalTrials.gov lists 8 registered trials linking Oxaliplatin to Lung Cancer: 3 are currently recruiting; 1 is active or not yet recruiting; 2 have completed; 2 are terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. The most advanced is Phase 1 (NCT06131840). It plans or enrolled 914 participants. Registration activity spans 2017 to 2025.
What does the evidence show for Oxaliplatin in Lung Cancer?
Oxaliplatin has both completed registered trials and synthesis-level publications linked to Lung Cancer. That is the strongest profile in this database, but the summaries here do not extract effect sizes, so read the linked reviews for direction and magnitude of benefit. OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in DGIdb, in this case via the biomarker or target BRCA1. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.
Cite this page
Data: ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and the OSMF therapeutic agent database. Last updated 2026-07-05. Page built 2026-10-07.