Disease × agent evidence record

Gabapentin Enacarbil for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA): evidence, trials and status

Gabapentin Enacarbil has 2 completed registered trials for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) but no linked publication, which usually means results are unpublished, pending, or not yet matched to this record.

2 registered trials 0 recruiting 0 publications Evidence tier A · Strong Score 27.0
Research Tracker › Pairs › Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) › Gabapentin Enacarbil
Research map, not treatment advice. This page aggregates registry and literature records. It does not evaluate efficacy, dosing or safety for any individual. Discuss any treatment decision with a qualified clinician.

Summary

Gabapentin Enacarbil has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA). ClinicalTrials.gov lists 2 registered trials linking Gabapentin Enacarbil to Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA): 2 have completed. The most advanced is Phase 3 (NCT02987985). The largest enrolment is 62 participants (NCT00886236). Registration activity spans 2008 to 2017. No published literature item is linked to Gabapentin Enacarbil and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) in the OSMF database yet, so the record rests on registry entries alone. Registry entries describe intent to study, not outcomes.

The RepurpOS disease-intelligence file for Obstructive Sleep Apnea ranks 50 candidate therapeutics from Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and PubMed; only a minority carry direct clinical evidence, and this page covers one of those. Spontaneous remission context recorded for the condition: Spontaneous resolution without intervention rare; weight loss of 10-15% reduces AHI by 25-50% in obese patients; mild OSA may resolve with weight loss; moderate-severe OSA essentially irreversible without intervention.

Evidence table

Evidence tierA · Strong
Evidence score27.0 (trials 7.0, literature 0.0, tier 15, approved bonus 5.0)
Registered trials2 total: 0 recruiting, 0 active / not yet recruiting, 2 completed, 0 other
Linked publications0
Agent typeDrug (Small molecule)
Development stage (any indication)Approved
Mechanism / classmodulator
Data sourcesDGIdb
Linked via biomarker / targetCACNA1F
How the evidence score is calculated
  • Each registered trial scores by status (recruiting / active / enrolling 3, completed 2.5, not yet recruiting 2, unknown 1, terminated / withdrawn / suspended 0.5) plus a phase bonus (phase 3-4 +2, phase 2 +1, phase 1 +0.5). The trial component is capped at 30.
  • Each literature item scores by design (Cochrane review 5, meta-analysis 4, systematic review 3, RCT 3, clinical trial publication 2, curated reference 1.5, other PubMed record 1). The literature component is capped at 30.
  • The existing evidence tier adds 15 (A / Strong), 10 (B / Moderate), 5 (C / Preliminary) or 0 (D / Anecdotal).
  • Agents approved for any indication (max clinical phase 4) add 5, because an approved agent has an established safety profile that lowers the barrier to repurposing trials.
  • The score ranks what has been studied, not what works. It does not read effect sizes or directions of effect.

Registered clinical trials

NCT IDTitleStatusPhaseEnrolment
NCT02987985Efficacy of Opioid-free Anesthesia in Reducing Postoperative Respiratory Depression in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy
2017
completedPhase 350
NCT00886236Study of the Effect of the Drug Gabapentin on Postoperative Pain and Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
2008
completedNot applicable62

Search ClinicalTrials.gov for newer studies

Published literature

No publication is linked to this pair yet.

Run the live PubMed search

Mechanism and notes

Recorded mechanism or class: modulator.

OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in DGIdb, in this case via the biomarker or target CACNA1F. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.

Frequently asked questions

Is Gabapentin Enacarbil approved for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA)?

Gabapentin Enacarbil has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA). Approval status for the specific indication should always be confirmed with the relevant regulator and prescribing information.

Is Gabapentin Enacarbil in clinical trials for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA)?

ClinicalTrials.gov lists 2 registered trials linking Gabapentin Enacarbil to Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA): 2 have completed. The most advanced is Phase 3 (NCT02987985). The largest enrolment is 62 participants (NCT00886236). Registration activity spans 2008 to 2017.

What does the evidence show for Gabapentin Enacarbil in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA)?

Gabapentin Enacarbil has 2 completed registered trials for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) but no linked publication, which usually means results are unpublished, pending, or not yet matched to this record. OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in DGIdb, in this case via the biomarker or target CACNA1F. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.

Cite this page

Open Source Medicine Foundation. Gabapentin Enacarbil for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA): evidence, trials and status. OSMF Research Tracker. Updated 2026-07-06. https://research.opensourcemed.info/pairs/obstructive-sleep-apnea-syndrome/gabapentin-enacarbil.html

Data: ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and the OSMF therapeutic agent database. Last updated 2026-07-06. Page built 2026-10-07.

Get OSMF research updates on Substack

This is a research map, not treatment advice. Evidence tiers and scores summarise what has been studied, not whether a treatment works or is safe for you.