Summary
Decitabine has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Cancer would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov lists 8 registered trials linking Decitabine to Cancer: 1 is active or not yet recruiting; 4 have completed; 3 are terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. The most advanced is Phase 2 (NCT00867672). The largest enrolment is 222 participants (NCT04485052). Registration activity spans 2004 to 2022. The literature layer holds 18 publications for this pair: 5 Cochrane reviews, 4 meta-analyses, 1 systematic review, 3 randomised controlled trial publications and 5 clinical trial publications. Publication years run from 2021 to 2026. Because at least one synthesis-level source exists (systematic review, meta-analysis or Cochrane review), this pair has been assessed beyond single studies, although the synthesis may concern a different indication.
The RepurpOS disease-intelligence file for Cancer ranks 1226 candidate therapeutics from Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and PubMed; only a minority carry direct clinical evidence, and this page covers one of those. Spontaneous remission context recorded for the condition: Spontaneous regression is rare (<0.5% of cases); 5-year survival without treatment: <5% for advanced NSCLC; ~20% for stage I-II with surgery.
Evidence table
| Evidence tier | A · Strong |
|---|---|
| Evidence score | 70.0 (trials 20.0, literature 30.0, tier 15, approved bonus 5.0) |
| Registered trials | 8 total: 0 recruiting, 1 active / not yet recruiting, 4 completed, 3 other |
| Linked publications | 18 (5 Cochrane reviews, 5 clinical trial publications, 4 meta-analyses, 3 randomised controlled trial publications, 1 systematic review) |
| Agent type | Drug (Small molecule) |
| Development stage (any indication) | Approved |
| Mechanism / class | Not recorded |
| Data sources | Open Targets, ChEMBL |
How the evidence score is calculated
- Each registered trial scores by status (recruiting / active / enrolling 3, completed 2.5, not yet recruiting 2, unknown 1, terminated / withdrawn / suspended 0.5) plus a phase bonus (phase 3-4 +2, phase 2 +1, phase 1 +0.5). The trial component is capped at 30.
- Each literature item scores by design (Cochrane review 5, meta-analysis 4, systematic review 3, RCT 3, clinical trial publication 2, curated reference 1.5, other PubMed record 1). The literature component is capped at 30.
- The existing evidence tier adds 15 (A / Strong), 10 (B / Moderate), 5 (C / Preliminary) or 0 (D / Anecdotal).
- Agents approved for any indication (max clinical phase 4) add 5, because an approved agent has an established safety profile that lowers the barrier to repurposing trials.
- The score ranks what has been studied, not what works. It does not read effect sizes or directions of effect.
Registered clinical trials
| NCT ID | Title | Status | Phase | Enrolment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT01893372 | Eltrombopag With or Without Hypomethylating Agent After Hypomethylating Agent Failure For Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) 2013 | completed | Phase 2 | 29 |
| NCT00867672 | Study of Decitabine Alone or in Combination With Valproic Acid and All-trans Retinoic Acid in Acute Myeloid Leukemia 2011 | completed | Phase 2 | 204 |
| NCT00085293 | Decitabine in Treating Patients With Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Cancer or Follicular Thyroid Cancer Unresponsive to Iodine I 131 2004 | completed | Phase 2 | 12 |
| NCT00740181 | Decitabine, Cytarabine, GCSF for Refractory AML/MDS 2008 | terminated | Phase 2 | 9 |
| NCT03613532 | Venetoclax Added to Fludarabine + Busulfan Prior to Transplant and to Maintenance Therapy for AML, MDS, and MDS/MPN 2018 | active, not recruiting | Phase 1 | 102 |
| NCT05829226 | A Phase 1 Study With LYT-200 in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), or With Relapsed/Refractory, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) 2022 | completed | Phase 1 | 101 |
| NCT02412475 | Epigenetic Reprogramming in Relapse AML 2015 | terminated | Phase 1 | 3 |
| NCT04485052 | Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of IBI188 in Combination With Demethylating Agents in Treatment of Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia 2020 | suspended | PHASE1, PHASE2 | 222 |
Published literature
- Clinical trial publication All-Oral Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid LeukemiaRoboz GJ, Zeidan AM, Mannis GN et al. · The New England journal of medicine · 2026 · PMID 42235013
- Clinical trial publication [Comparison of the efficacy and safety of venetoclax plus azacitidine versus D-CAG regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia]Liu ZY, Chu XG, Dong GP et al. · Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026 · PMID 41991313
- Clinical trial publication Demethylation-primed tandem CD19/CD20 CAR T cells in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma: a phase I/II trialWang C, Guo Y, Han F et al. · Nature communications · 2026 · PMID 41986386
- Clinical trial publication Does stringent cytoreduction improve survival in advanced proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia?Selimoglu-Buet D, Chevret S, Santini V et al. · Leukemia · 2026 · PMID 41803403
- Clinical trial publication Venetoclax/FluBu2 RIC transplant followed by all-oral venetoclax/decitabine maintenance for poor-risk MDS/AMLGarcia JS, Kim HT, Murdock HM et al. · Blood advances · 2026 · PMID 41348911
- Cochrane review Hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax in younger acute myeloid leukemia: Meta-analysis of a shifting treatment paradigmPerrone S, De Fazio L, Monachetti S et al. · Cancer · 2026 · PMID 41914434
- Meta-analysis Comparative efficacy of different therapeutic approaches in treatment naïve FLT3-mutated AML eligible for intensive chemotherapy: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized trialsBruzzese A, Lofaro D, Martino EA et al. · Annals of hematology · 2026 · PMID 41940985
- Meta-analysis Antileukemic therapies for older adults with AML ineligible for conventional therapy: systematic review and meta-analysisOliveros MJ, Chowdhury SR, Roldan Y et al. · Blood advances · 2026 · PMID 41538293
- Systematic review Health-related quality of life of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms treated with decitabine: a systematic literature reviewCannella L, Venditti A, Palmieri R et al. · Annals of hematology · 2026 · PMID 41995852
- Cochrane review The efficacy and safety of venetoclax combined with decitabine in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysisHe F, Tian T, Qiao S et al. · Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025 · PMID 40632299
- Meta-analysis The effects of adding decitabine to conditioning regimen for patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysisLuo C, Zhang J, Huang X et al. · Annals of hematology · 2025 · PMID 41432753
- Meta-analysis Comparative efficacy of venetoclax and hypomethylating agents in acute myeloid leukemia treatment: a meta-analysis of clinical trials and Real-World outcomesSanz-Solas A, Saiz-Rodríguez M, Simal SC et al. · Annals of hematology · 2025 · PMID 40884567
- Randomized controlled trial Efficacy and safety of oral decitabine/cedazuridine in the chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia subpopulations from phase 2 and 3 studiesSavona MR, Odenike O, Roboz GJ et al. · British journal of haematology · 2025 · PMID 40524338
- Randomized controlled trial Venetoclax and decitabine vs intensive chemotherapy as induction for young patients with newly diagnosed AMLLu J, Xue SL, Wang Y et al. · Blood · 2025 · PMID 40009498
- Randomized controlled trial Impact of TP53 Mutation Status in Elderly AML Patients When Adding All-Trans Retinoic Acid or Valproic Acid to DecitabineBresser H, Schmoor C, Grishina O et al. · European journal of haematology · 2025 · PMID 39400388
- Cochrane review Efficacy of decitabine combined with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of recurrent and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML): A systematic review and meta-analysisZhang D, Chen J · Medicine · 2022 · PMID 36123842
- Cochrane review Less intensive antileukemic therapies (monotherapy and/or combination) for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia who are not candidates for intensive antileukemic therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysisColunga-Lozano LE, Kenji Nampo F, Agarwal A et al. · PloS one · 2022 · PMID 35108310
- Cochrane review Maintenance therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic transplant for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysisPasvolsky O, Shimony S, Yeshurun M et al. · Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2021 · PMID 34325602
Mechanism and notes
No mechanism of action is recorded for this pair in the source databases.
OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in Open Targets and ChEMBL. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.
Frequently asked questions
Is Decitabine approved for Cancer?
Decitabine has reached the approved stage (maximum clinical phase 4) for at least one indication, so its use in Cancer would be drug repurposing rather than first-in-human development. This does not mean it is approved for Cancer. Approval status for the specific indication should always be confirmed with the relevant regulator and prescribing information.
Is Decitabine in clinical trials for Cancer?
ClinicalTrials.gov lists 8 registered trials linking Decitabine to Cancer: 1 is active or not yet recruiting; 4 have completed; 3 are terminated, withdrawn, suspended or of unknown status. The most advanced is Phase 2 (NCT00867672). The largest enrolment is 222 participants (NCT04485052). Registration activity spans 2004 to 2022.
What does the evidence show for Decitabine in Cancer?
Decitabine has both completed registered trials and synthesis-level publications linked to Cancer. That is the strongest profile in this database, but the summaries here do not extract effect sizes, so read the linked reviews for direction and magnitude of benefit. OSMF's existing evidence tier for this pair is A (Strong), derived from the strength of the disease association recorded in Open Targets and ChEMBL. The tier describes how well the drug-disease link is documented, not how well the drug works.
Cite this page
Data: ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Open Targets, ChEMBL, DGIdb and the OSMF therapeutic agent database. Last updated 2026-07-05. Page built 2026-10-07.